Rapide retour sur l'évolution du "discours sécuritaire" au cours des dernières années.

Ça me rappelle ce que disait Snowden dans son long entretien (https://links.nekoblog.org/?G6XqlQ).

Snowden : « When they use the word security, they’re not talking about safety. What they’re talking about is stability. Like when they’re saying that they’re saving lives by bombing them. Stability is the new highest value. It’s not about freedom, it’s not about liberty, it’s not even about safety. It’s about avoiding change. It’s about ensuring that things are predictable, shapeable, because then they are controllable.
Journaliste : « At least you think they are. »
S : « Right. You think they are controllable. »
J : « Until Islamic State comes along and destroys the whole idea. »
S : « Right. Like with the drone program, which creates more terrorists than it kills. There was no Islamic State until we started bombing these states. The biggest threat we face in the region was born from our own policies. »

EDIT : Rien à voir, mais je met ça de côté aussi à propos de la différence entre liberty et freedom > http://www.nakedtranslations.com/fr/2005/liberty-et-freedom
Ya 3 liens dans l'article, je prendrai le temps de les lire plus tard.

EDIT² : http://lmsi.net/la-premiere-des-libertes
http://abonnes.lemonde.fr/attaques-a-paris/article/2015/11/23/securite-et-liberte-le-debat-escamote_4815597_4809495.html
EDIT³ : https://twitter.com/mathieumatiu/status/667262641413427200
EDIT⁴ : "Comment l’obsession sécuritaire fait muter la démocratie" > https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2014/01/AGAMBEN/49997 #Giorgio Agamben